Desperate Marketers Make Desperate Decisions
That's the first thought that entered my mind each time I
encountered a newspaper headline where a banker was disparaging his or her
competitors for offering a free gift for opening a new checking account.
Obviously these bank marketers – or their agencies – were
looking for some point of differentiation. Not finding one, they simply made
the bad decision to criticize what their competitor was doing.
First, in January, 2007, the Safe Credit Union newspaper ad
for free checking used two visuals in its headline. Under the bold headline
"Their free checking"
was a toaster. Under the second bold headline "Our free checking" was a plasma flat screen TV. Unfortunately,
in the mice-type disclosure copy under the image of the TV readers would
discover that only one TV would be awarded at the end of a long-running
sweepstakes.
To me, this ad was a classic example of "bait and
switch."
Next, in July, 2007, the Washington Mutual (WaMu) newspaper
ad displayed the following headline, "Respect,
not toasters" in its ad for free checking. There, underneath
the big, bold headline was a picture of a toaster with well-done toast still in
their slots.
Unfortunately, WaMu is no longer with us.
Finally, in February, 2008, the Cornhusker Bank newspaper ad
used the following headline, "We Understand tote bags
and free gifts don't matter to your family's budget." Fortunately,
for the much maligned toaster, it was not shown in this ad.
You'll find reprints of all three ads in the sidebar to your
right.
The last two headlines are examples of marketers trying to
create a contrived trade-off in the
minds of consumers.
The marketers behind the Cornhusker headline are subtly
planting the seed that perhaps these free gifts are standing in the way of the customer
earning interest. While the WaMu headline suggests that a free gift and being
treated with respect are mutually exclusive choices. That's so absurd that it's
laughable.
Being totally disingenuous, the marketers behind the Safe
Credit Union ad are simply hoping that prospects will quickly believe that
every new checking customer receives a flat screen TV as a free gift. After
all, you have to stop and read the extremely small 8-point type disclosure copy
underneath the TV to learn that you have to enter to win the TV.
Do you believe these marketers succeeded in differentiating
their products or offers?
THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
Common sense should dictate to marketers that if you can't
find a meaningful point of difference for your product, you simply haven't
tried hard enough.
Taking the easy way out and attacking your competitor can
have unintended consequences.
This is especially true if you are using a marketing to
women strategy.
In her 2003 book, Marketing to Women, Marti Barletta
advises marketers to avoid putting down
their competitors. Barletta writes, "Because of their egalitarian culture,
women see any kind of put-down as inappropriate – 'shady dealings'. The key is
to keep it neutral, not negative."
While a bit more subtle than the others, the folks at
Cornhusker Bank are definitely trying to put down their competition by using
the headline, "We Understand tote bags and free gifts don't matter to your
family budget."
In addition, such ads can backfire as they actually remind
consumers that other banks and credit unions must be offering free gifts – much
to the delight of those banks and credit unions doing so. After all, if these
free gifts weren't successful, there'd be no use attacking them.
It's obvious that such ads don't work as they seldom appear
more than once or twice before being assigned to the bank marketer's file of
"bad ideas."
In reality, these three banks are guilty of creating a
non-issue. As our senior copywriter commented, "Nobody will turn down a
gift. And nobody thinks less of a bank that gives them something free."
Perhaps a case could be made for "marketing
malpractice" as it's wrong to malign your competition in lieu of providing
a meaningful point of differentiation for your checking account.
Fortunately, almost always the law of unintended
consequences prevails – providing the deserved justice. In these instances,
valuable marketing dollars wasted on bad newspaper ads while drawing attention
to the good deeds of your competitors.
FREE GIFTS HAVE WORKED FOR MANY YEARS
Most likely banks began offering free gifts to attract new
customers well over a hundred years ago – shortly after a second or third bank
opened in the same town.
It was in 1933, with passage of the Glass-Steagall Act, that
free gifts took on a much more important role in attracting new customers.
Regulation Q was part of the Glass-Steagall Act. It put a
limit on the interest rates banks could pay depositors, including zero on demand
deposits…better known as checking accounts to consumers. This new inability to differentiate one bank’s checking account from
another based on the interest rates paid, caused banks to begin competing aggressively
for checking accounts using free gifts as a point of differentiation.
Under Regulation Q, the rather mundane toaster became the
symbol of the almost unlimited variety of free gifts (or premiums) used by
banks from 1933 through 1979 to convince consumers to open a checking account
at one bank over another.
Perhaps because of its bland, mundane persona, comedians, cartoonists,
and uninformed marketers have adopted the poor toaster as the symbol of the
myriad of gifts flowing from the doors of neighborhood banks during the
post-war boom period. In reality, toasters were not a common free gift.
As a result of the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the
interest rate ceilings imposed by Regulation Q were phased out, ending in
March, 1986. This enabled banks to walk away from free gifts and begin offering
interest on checking account balances.
After a few years it became evident to many bankers that
offering interest on checking balances can be a very costly point of
differentiation. It wasn’t long before the free gift for opening a checking
account slowly made its way back into the creative team’s tool box.
In fact, the free gift became an integral component of the
Free Checking and Free Gift turnkey checking acquisition program introduced by
ACTON in 1982. ACTON's program has worked successfully for well over 26 years
and it's still delivering great results.
SIX REASONS WHY FREE GIFTS WORK
At a minimum, there are six good reasons why free gifts continue
being offered today by a growing number of banks and credit unions.
1. Free gifts enable you to benefit from the power of the word "free."
2. Free gifts improve your offer.
3. Free gifts often serve as the tie-breaker.
4. Free gifts provide instant gratification.
5. Free gifts are better than cash and discounts.
6. Free gifts cost less.
THE POWER OF THE WORD "FREE"
The word "free" is one of the most powerful words
in marketing…especially in direct response marketing.
And what could be better than using the word "free"?
Using the words "free gift."
Yes, the word "free" is redundant when used to
describe a "gift." Occasionally, a gifted copywriter is chastised for
using the term “free gift” when the word “gift” is grammatically correct.
So why do direct response copywriters insist on calling a
gift a “free gift”?
The answer was provided by freelance copywriter Bob Bly in
his article, "What conversational copy means," which appeared in the
October 22, 2007 issue of DM News.
According to Bly, "The goal of direct response
copywriting is not to produce perfect prose. It is to persuade the consumer to
buy your product, and a copywriter should do whatever it takes to achieve that
goal.
"For example, grammarians dislike the phrase 'free
gift,' complaining that 'free' is inherent in the definition of gift. I
remember years ago hearing about a mailer who split test 'free gift' versus 'gift.'
Not only did 'free gift' win handily, but a number of recipients of the 'gift'
letter responded by asking whether the gift was indeed free.
"As Emerson once said: 'It is not enough to write so
you can be understood; you must write so clearly that you cannot be
misunderstood.'"
While the word "free" is overused today, it is
still a very powerful marketing word
when used appropriately.
What do the experts say about using the word
"free"?
- "Free
is a magic word," exclaims direct
mail consultant Dick Benson.
- "'Free'
is of course a hackneyed and moss-covered word, but there doesn't seem to
be any equally strong or less blatant substitute for it," wrote legendary copywriter Victor O.
Schwab.
- "Emphasize
the word 'Free.' You can increase replies by putting the word 'Free' in
big print or in capital letters. In broadcast advertising and in printed
advertising you can repeat the word 'free' several times," advised famous ad man and copywriter
John Caples.
- "Samples
serve numerous valuable purposes. They enable one to use the word 'Free'
in ads. That often multiplies readers,"
according to Claude Hopkins.
- "Bob
Kalian, a New York entrepreneur, realized that 'free' was one of the most
powerful words in direct marketing, so he decided to build an entire
business around it," writes
freelance copywriter Robert W. Bly in his 2002 book, The Complete
Idiot's Guide to Direct Marketing.
With ACTON Marketing's Free Checking and Free Gift turnkey
marketing program, you get to use the powerful marketing word "free"
twice in the program name alone.
|